Castle / Bradley 2016

 C-Span April 24, 2016 | Constitution Party and Third-Party Presidential Bids

Constitution Party 2016 presidential candidate Darrell Castle talked by video from Memphis, Tennessee, about his bid for the presidency, as well as the role of third-party candidates in the 2016 election. 

Castle / Bradley 2016

“It is the nature of the State to seek dominance over the population.   Freedom will not ultimately remain intact if we leave it unattended.  America needs forward thinking leaders — leaders who do not apologize to the politically-correct demands of the thought police.   Self-hatred and appeasement only foster more disrespect.  We must find a way to chart our own course in the world as free and independent people.” - Darrel Castle

Liberty-Pac: Quick note, Comfortably numb from this past weeks events and thinking strategies in these AM hours hummm.... I believe I will miss all this, being right here at this moment in time, many many years from now. It is truly an extraordinary time to be alive.

The present generation must continue the struggle for Liberty in our time. For this is not a single battle to be waged in the war of ideas, but a series of battles in our great generational struggle to liberate mankind from the hands of tyranny and oppression.

Future generations will one day emulate and build off the great works we accomplished in our day. Stay the course, pursue the goal and never give up.

“Let us disappoint the men who are raising themselves upon the ruin of this country.” ~John Adams~

Ron Paul's Final Warning

Video: Ron Paul's Final Final Warning

PDF: Ron Pauls Final Warning 
Stansberry Research | 2015
Publication: America 2020 PDF
Survival Blueprint: Frequently Asked Questions

“Ron Paul former U.S. Presidential candidate and 22-year Congressman predicts the next huge disaster for America—worse than 2008, Black Monday and Great Depression—and how you should prepare to protect yourself, your family and your finances.”

“Stansberry Research is an independent financial research firm, recently partnered with former Congressman Dr. Ron Paul, delivering unbiased investment intelligence to self-directed investors seeking an edge in a wide variety of sectors and market conditions. Stansberry experts produce a steady stream of timely research that covers topics such as value investing, maximizing income, energy-sector investing, resources, biotech, medical technologies, financials, technology, short-selling, macroeconomic analysis, and options trading. Stansberry’s unrelenting and compromised insight of market trends and analysis has made it one of the most respected and sought-after research organizations in the financial sector.

Founded in 1999 and based out of Baltimore, Maryland, Stansberry Research has nearly two dozen analysts and researchers– including former hedge-fund managers and buy-side financial experts – who publish proprietary insights to more than 350,000 individual subscribers in more than 100 countries.”

APOTHEOSIS OF WASHINGTON

Liberty-Pac: Apotheosis Of Washington  a fascinating piece of art work located in the eye of the US. Capitol rotunda. The painting depicts Washington rising to the heavens in glory and surrounded by Mythical Gods and Goddesses. By: Constantino Brumidi in ( 1865 ) NOTE: (The word "apotheosis" in the title means literally the raising of a person to the rank of a god, or the glorification of a person as an ideal; George Washington was honored as a national icon in the nineteenth century.)

kids.clerk.house.gov Quote: “Constantino Brumidi painted The Apotheosis of Washington on the ceiling of the Rotunda, the center of the Capitol, in 1865. He used a fresco technique in which water-based paints are applied to freshly spread plaster.

The subjects shown in the dome mix individuals from American history, gods of Roman mythology and personifications—abstract concepts illustrated as a person. This mixture of history and myth was a common way to show abstract ideas in art in the 19th century, and would have been easily grasped by viewers at the time.

The center of the painting shows George Washington rising into the heavens in glory. Female personifications of Liberty and Victory or Fame are at his sides. Thirteen maidens, symbolizing the thirteen original states, circle the three central figures. The groups around the perimeter of the main scene illustrate important aspects of America, and tell the viewer what the nation prided itself in during the 19th century. Innovation and industry are important recurring themes.” End Quote

Reference: http://kids.clerk.house.gov/high-school/lesson.html?intID=40
Reference: http://www.aoc.gov/capitol-hill/other-paintings-and-murals/apotheosis-Washington

“Ron Paul The Last Statesman”

Submitted By: throughtheblack @ Daily Paul | October 13, 2011

Fifty or One

By: Rob James | December 26, 2011

“Is it better to have Tyranny from THE STATE or Tyranny from A State? Do you want one way or fifty ways to have your rights violated? Do you want one dictator or fifty? I ask these questions so that you'll think about the 9th and 10th Amendments of the Constitution, and how we should define States' Rights. In the 9th Amendment it states: 

"The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." 

In the 10th Amendment it states: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

In the Declaration of Independence, it speaks of things like 'Laws of Nature', 'unalienable Rights' and 'free People'; but how do we apply these things to the Constitution, or more specifically, with the Bill of Rights? If the primary purpose of government is to protect the rights and property of a free people (those who have given it the authority to do so), and individuals have rights that are unalienable and partially defined in the Bill of Rights, would a state have any more authority to control the lives of an individual than the Federal government does? No, states are entrusted with the same protective authority as the Federal government, they exist to protect the rights and property of it's people. So if it is wrong for THE STATE to infringe on your rights, it would also be wrong for A State to do the same. A state operates as a mini-republic within the Union, with the same responsibility for protecting your rights as the Federal government.

That being said, what decisions are left for a state to make under the 9th and 10th Amendments, that are not 'reserved by the people"? Who you can associate with, who you can marry, what you can do with your body, what you can put in your body, what you can do with your property (and other personal decisions like this), do not belong to any level of government, they belong to "the people"; and the only reason for any level of government to get involved with these personal decisions, is when the actions of one individual infringe on the rights of another individual. So when someone says that the individual States (not the Federal government), should decide issues of marriage, drug prohibition, etc, they infer that the States have the authority to violate your individual rights.”