Total Pageviews

Thursday, February 2, 2017


Liberty-Pac, We have Invoked special trust, confidence, patriotism, valor, fidelity and professional journalist excellence in you Mr. Swann, as we move forward in our great generational struggle and fight for Liberty in our time. Thank you Sir!!! 
TRUTH IN MEDIA By: Ben Swann | 12 March 2015

Quote: In the latest episode of Truth in Media, Ben Swann investigates the origins of the militant group referred to as the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS). Read More Here.

US. Senator Rand Paul | 18 September 2014

US. Senator Rand Paul Argues Against U.S. Arming Syrian Rebels on Senate Floor - September 18, 2014

CIA, Backed Rebel Groups Fighting PENTAGON Rebel Groups In Syria.

Chicago Tribune 
26 March 2016 - CIA-Armed Militias Shooting at Pentagon-Armed Militias in Syria.

27 March 2016 - Militants Armed by the Pentagon fight those Armed by the CIA” 

By: Ben Swann | 19 November 2015

Quote: There is so much debate over how the U.S. and other nations will stop ISIS but can these leaders be trusted? Ben Swann exposes secret DOD Documents that prove the U.S. wanted ISIS to emerge in Syria.” End Quote

By: Ben Swann | 28 December 2016 

Quote: Reality Check: Proof That Those "Moderate Rebels" in Syria are Really Jihadists. "These are not "freedom fighters"they are not looking to make Syria free, they are looking to enslave it." Part 1.  End quote

13  Dec 2013 | BBC Guide to Syrian Rebels

11 Sept 2013 | Washington Post CIA begins weapons delivery to Syrian rebels

22 Sept 2015 | Telegraph US-trained Division 30 rebels 'betray US and hand weapons over to al-Qaeda's affiliate in Syria'

9 Oct 2015 | BBC US to abandon training new Syria rebel groups

14 March 2015 | International Business Times Four Years Later, The Free Syrian Army Has Collapsed

Saturday, January 28, 2017

Repeal - REAL ID ACT 2017

Petition: Repeal - REAL ID ACT 2017

Quote: Fellow Patriot,

Congress tucked the REAL ID Act inside a military spending bill in 2005.

One provision of REAL ID laid out requirements for state drivers' licenses, and made a driver's license the only form of acceptable ID for any "federal function."

But the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has unlimited authority to require REAL ID for any other activity.

If we don't roll back REAL ID while continuing to stop states from bowing to D.C.'s anti-liberty demands, all of your information will be shared between states and even with other countries.

That's why it's so CRITICAL you contact your Senator RIGHT NOW, and demand they turn back REAL ID and support S.126 Repeal ID Act of 2017.

After you sign your Directive, please make a generous contribution to help Campaign for Liberty recruit more Americans to this vital fight. End Quote

 In Liberty,

Norm Singleton President, Campaign for Liberty

Sunday, January 22, 2017

Trump Inauguration - BLACK BLOC

By: WeAreChange.org / Luke Rudkowski | 20 Jan 2017

Quote " In this video, we provide exclusive coverage of the protests following the inauguration. Riot Police in D.C. have used pepper spray and flash band grenades in their response to the protesters." End quote

Visit our MAIN SITE for more Breaking News: WeAreChange.org

PATREON: https://www.patreon.com/WeAreChange?a
SNAPCHAT: LukeWeAreChange
FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/LukeWeAreChange
TWITTER: https://twitter.com/Lukewearechange
INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/lukewearechange/
STEEMIT: https://steemit.com/@lukewearechange

By: WeAreChange.org / Luke Rudkowski | 20 Jan 2017

By: WeAreChange.org / Luke Rudkowski | 20 Jan 2017

By: WeAreChange.org / Luke Rudkowski | 20 Jan 2017

Sunday, January 8, 2017

U.S. Gov. to Fund Propaganda For U.S. Citizens

TRUTH IN MEDIABy: Ben Swann | 5 Jan 2017

Quote: Reality Check: President Obama Quietly Signs New Law To Allow U.S. Gov. to Fund Propaganda For U.S. Citizens. End quote

26 Dec 2016 (NDAA) S.2943 National Defense Authorization Act for 2017 Slipped into the bill Countering Disinformation And Propaganda Act Link coming soon. Disabled due to high traffic volume.

23 Dec 2016 Obama Signs Portman-Murphy Counter-Propaganda Bill into Law


Saturday, January 7, 2017

Appoint Ron Paul Federal Reserve Board

PETITION: RON PAUL Federal Reserve Board of Governors

Dear Friend of Liberty 

"Getting out of debt" is a common New Year's resolution. But it wouldn't be much of a stretch to assume it's not a popular one with Janet Yellen, the Federal Reserve, and the free-spending politicians hooked on their easy money. 

With the Federal Government hurtling toward $20 TRILLION dollars in debt, the American people cried "ENOUGH" on Election Day 2016, and rejected the Fed's fiscal insanity. 

Now, 2017 could see the r3VOLution's biggest victory yet in Campaign for Liberty's fight against the Fed's funny-money policy and the bloated government it funds. 

But only if you and I make it happen. 

President-elect Trump was elected on a platform of "draining the swamp" and auditing the Federal Reserve. 

But he's already under tremendous pressure to "go with the flow" as the Fed continues to debase our currency

He needs to hear from you right now that the American people support his promise to Audit the Federal Reserve during his first 100 days in office. 

And there's another thing Donald Trump can do to prove he's serious about returning this country to its glory days as a beacon of freedom and prosperity... 

...Nominate my father, Dr. Ron Paul, to the U.S. Federal Reserve's Board of Governors!

I can think of no better New Year's gift to the American people than to take a SLEDGEHAMMER to the Washington, D.C. Leviathan by nominating my dad to the Fed's Board of Governors and passing Audit the Fed. 

But Wall Street banksters, Big Government apologists, and their pals in the media are STILL screaming at the top of their lungs to tell Donald Trump "HANDS OFF!" of the biggest enabler of statism in Washington, D.C. 

So I am counting on your signed petition –- and your financial support -- to help Campaign for Liberty strike a blow at the biggest enemy of liberty today in Washington, D.C. 

Please click here to sign your petition to President-elect Donald Trump urging him to appoint my dad -- C4L Founder Ron Paul -- and to Audit the Fed in his first 100 days in office. 

Unlike the Federal Reserve, Campaign for Liberty doesn't create money out of thin air

We rely on the financial support of patriotic Americans like you to ensure our programs have the teeth necessary to combat the nearly limitless government resources at every level. 

So please chip in with your generous donation to stand with Campaign for Liberty in our fight to expose the Fed's misdealings and restore sanity to our monetary policy."

For Liberty, 

Ronnie Paul 

Chairman of the Board

Tuesday, January 3, 2017

Moderate Rebels" in Syria are Really Jihadists

By: Ben Swann | 28 December 2016 

Reality Check: Quote Proof That Those "Moderate Rebels" in Syria are Really Jihadists. "These are not "freedom fighters"they are not looking to make Syria free, they are looking to enslave it. Part 1.  End quote

13  Dec 2013 | BBC Guide to Syrian Rebels

11 Sept 2013 | Washington Post CIA begins weapons delivery to Syrian rebels

22 Sept 2015 | Telegraph US-trained Division 30 rebels 'betray US and hand weapons over to al-Qaeda's affiliate in Syria'

9 Oct 2015 | BBC US to abandon training new Syria rebel groups

14 March 2015 | International Business Times Four Years Later, The Free Syrian Army Has Collapsed

Friday, December 23, 2016

After Aleppo: We Need a New Syria Policy

By: Ron Paul | Liberty-Pac | 19 Dec 2016

Ron Paul Institute.org

By: RON PAUL – Quote Over the past week, eastern Aleppo was completely brought back under control of the Syrian government. The population began to return to its homes, many of which were abandoned when al-Qaeda-linked rebels took over in 2012. As far as I know, the western mainstream media did not have a single reporter on the ground in Aleppo, but relied on “activists” to inform us that the Syrian army was massacring the civilian population. It hardly makes sense for an army to fight and defeat armed rebels just so it can go in and murder unarmed civilians, but then again not much mainstream reporting on the tragedy in Syria has made sense.

I spoke to one western journalist last week who actually did report from Aleppo and she painted a very different picture of what was going on there. She conducted video interviews with dozens of local residents and they told of being held hostage and starved by the “rebels,” many of whom were using US-supplied weapons supposed to go to “moderates.”

We cannot be sure what exactly is happening in Aleppo, but we do know a few things about what happened in Syria over the past five years. This was no popular uprising to overthrow a dictator and bring in democracy. From the moment President Obama declared “Assad must go” and approved sending in weapons, it was obvious this was a foreign-sponsored regime change operation that used foreign fighters against Syrian government forces. If the Syrian people really opposed Assad, there is no way he could have survived five years of attack from foreigners and his own people.

Recently we heard that the CIA and Hillary Clinton believe that the Russians are behind leaked Democratic National Committee documents, and that the leaks were meant to influence the US presidential election in Donald Trump’s favor. These are the same people who for the past five years have been behind the violent overthrow of the Syrian government, which has cost the lives of hundreds of thousands. Isn’t supporting violent overthrow to influence who runs a country even worse than leaking documents? Is it OK when we do it? Why? Because we are the most powerful country?

We are a country sitting on $20 trillion in debt, living far beyond our means. Power can oftentimes be an illusion, and in any case it doesn’t last forever. We can be sure that the example we set while we are the most powerful country will be followed by those who may one day take our place. The hypocrisy of our political leaders who say one thing and do another does not go unnoticed.

We should end that hypocrisy starting with Syria. That government, along with its allies, seems to be on track to take their country back from ISIS, al-Qaeda, and other terrorist groups. The only sensible Syria policy is for the US to stop trying to overthrow their government, to treat others as we wish to be treated ourselves. It is a rule that is always good to remember, but perhaps especially important to recall at this time of year.
 End quote

Saturday, December 17, 2016

Ohio Gun Giveaway

Buckeye Firearms Association: Enter the Ohio Gun Giveaway today! Enter by 31 Dec 2016

YOU could be our next winner! 

Just subscribe to our weekly pro-gun newsletter and you'll be automatically entered to WIN in the Ohio Gun Giveaway. 

Read by thousands of pro-gun citizens, this newsletter keeps you up-to-date on the politics, legislation, events, and opinions that affect your gun rights.

We respect your privacy and keep your information confidential.

Wednesday, December 14, 2016

Neocons Are The Swamp

Chuck Baldwin Live
By: Chuck Baldwin | 8 Dec 2016 

Quote: Donald Trump won the White House on the promise to “drain the swamp” in Washington, D.C. He rode the wave of outsider all the way inside 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. But does Donald Trump even understand what the swamp is or who the people are that keep filling the swamp? By many of his presidential picks thus far (already summarized in this column), I am getting the impression that Trump may not understand who these swamp-fillers really are.

The swamp-fillers are NEOCONS. And they are the biggest threat to America and to everyone who lives on this planet regardless of nationality.

The word “neocon” has become a common term in our political lexicon. However, I don’t think most people truly understand its definition. And at this juncture, I am highly suspicious as to whether Donald Trump understands the definition.

Neocons can be Republican or Democrat, conservative or liberal. Political ideologies and parties mean nothing when it comes to who is a neocon. Many neocons are conservative on domestic social issues. Many are liberal on domestic social issues. When it comes to identifying a neocon, titles are meaningless. Hillary Clinton is as much a neocon as Paul Ryan.

First, it is imperative that we understand how politicians in Washington, D.C., operate. Congressional leaders know which congressmen and senators are controllable--and most of them are. Only a handful of our federal congressmen and senators are “untouchable.” My guess is, less than one hundred out of the 535 House members and U.S. senators are truly NOT controlled--and that includes liberals and conservatives.

The vast majority of our congressmen and senators are either morally tainted, which makes them prime targets for bribery and manipulation (can anyone say former Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert?), or they are egotistical, ambition-driven hedonists and sociopaths who will do virtually anything to advance themselves. This is the largest group, in my opinion. End quote...read more here

Sunday, December 11, 2016

War on ‘Fake News’ Part of a War on Free Speech

By: Ron Paul | Liberty-Pac | 12 Dec 2016

Ron Paul Institute.org

By: RON PAUL – Quote  A major threat to liberty is the assault on the right to discuss political issues, seek out alternative information sources, and promote dissenting ideas and causes such as non-interventionism in foreign and domestic affairs. If this ongoing assault on free speech succeeds, then all of our liberties are endangered.

One of the most common assaults on the First Amendment is the attempt to force public policy organizations to disclose their donors. Regardless of the intent of these laws, the effect is to subject supporters of controversial causes to harassment, or worse. This harassment makes other potential donors afraid to support organizations opposing a popular war or defending the rights of an unpopular group.

Many free speech opponents support laws and regulations forbidding activist or educational organizations from distributing factual information regarding a candidate’s positions for several months before an election. The ban would apply to communications that do not endorse or oppose any candidate. These laws would result in the only sources of information on the candidate’s views being the campaigns and the media.

Recently the Federal Election Commission (FEC) rejected a proposal to add language exempting books, movies, and streaming videos from its regulations. The majority of FEC commissioners apparently believe they should have the power, for example, to ban Oliver Stone’s biography of Edward Snowden, since it was released two months before the election and features clips of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump discussing Snowden.

The latest, and potentially most dangerous, threat to the First Amendment is the war on “fake news.” Those leading the war are using a few “viral” Internet hoaxes to justify increased government regulation — and even outright censorship — of Internet news sites. Some popular websites, such as Facebook, are not waiting for the government to force them to crack down on fake news.

Those calling for bans on “fake news” are not just trying to censor easily-disproved Internet hoaxes. They are working to create a government-sanctioned "gatekeeper" (to use Hillary Clinton’s infamous phrase) with the power to censor any news or opinion displeasing to the political establishment. None of those wringing their hands over fake news have expressed any concern over the fake news stories that helped lead to the Iraq War. Those fake news stories led to the destabilizing of the Middle East, the rise of ISIS, and the deaths of millions.

The war on “fake news” has taken a chilling turn with efforts to label news and opinion sites of alternative news sources as peddlers of Russian propaganda. The main targets are critics of US interventionist foreign policy, proponents of a gold standard, critics of the US government’s skyrocketing debt, and even those working to end police militarization. All have been smeared as anti-American agents of Russia.

Just last week, Congress passed legislation creating a special committee, composed of key federal agencies, to counter foreign interference in US elections. There have also been calls for congressional investigations into Russian influence on the elections. Can anyone doubt that the goal of this is to discredit and silence those who question the mainstream media’s pro-welfare/warfare state propaganda?
The attempts to ban “fake news;” smear antiwar, anti-Federal Reserve, and other pro-liberty movements as Russian agents; and stop independent organizations from discussing a politician’s record before an election are all parts of an ongoing war on the First Amendment. All Americans, no matter their political persuasion, have a stake in defeating these efforts to limit free speech. End quote